<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contesting the Death of Traditional CRM: Social CRM is a Process and not a Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creativestride.com/blog/2010/06/01/contesting-the-death-of-tradition-crm-social-crm-is-a-process-and-not-a-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creativestride.com/blog/2010/06/01/contesting-the-death-of-tradition-crm-social-crm-is-a-process-and-not-a-technology/</link>
	<description>Creative Stride Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 01:28:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olga Lednichenko</title>
		<link>http://creativestride.com/blog/2010/06/01/contesting-the-death-of-tradition-crm-social-crm-is-a-process-and-not-a-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Olga Lednichenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 01:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativestride.com/blog/?p=109#comment-24</guid>
		<description>you are quite right - but there is a disconnect between the social chatter - formed of unstructured data - and the transactional data that resides in your customer databases.

in the social web - we have sentences - &quot;love iphone but the service with AT&amp; T sucks -- its a lock in i wish i dont have to deal with&quot; -&gt; now this is a piece of unstructured data ( a sentence) with a negative- sentiment - about the telco service ,. can someone please tell me HOW this piece of data &quot; Love iphone&quot; + &quot;dislike AT&amp;T&quot; can be INTEGRATED with the transactional data, that resides in the CRM databases?

I am lost and here is why:

[a] the internal database has transactional data of the existing customers - say - purchase, warranty, contact and call log data .. BUT how do i know if the above views - expressed - { love iphone but hate AT&amp;T&quot; are views expressed by an existing customer ? 

[b] The chatter on the web is not a &#039;transaction&#039; in the proverbial sense. A transaction from an ERP stand point starts with Identification and the  a records, backed by a reason. IF reason is purchase its in the sales data, if reason is warranty - its alos in sales data and if reason is customer complaint - its in the customer sevrice data -&gt; BUT -&gt; its LINKED to a customer profile - using relational database tables..

the fundamental precept of a relational database is : [a] entity - this means defining the customer and [b] relationship -&gt; this means - capturing and associating the transactions made for or on behalf of the customer - in the database tables - and then only it is displayed in the presentation layer - the UI layer.

 well, on the web - the customer is :

[a] anonymous 

[b] unidentifiable 

[c] difficult to track and associate 

so, we hit a practical problem -&gt; HOW to associate an &#039;unstructured VIEW expressed by a customer on say twitter or facebook fan page or in a blog&quot; - with a customer in any database that exists !

Think of it - its not easy if not impossible..

regards
olga lednichenko</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are quite right &#8211; but there is a disconnect between the social chatter &#8211; formed of unstructured data &#8211; and the transactional data that resides in your customer databases.</p>
<p>in the social web &#8211; we have sentences &#8211; &#8220;love iphone but the service with AT&amp; T sucks &#8212; its a lock in i wish i dont have to deal with&#8221; -&gt; now this is a piece of unstructured data ( a sentence) with a negative- sentiment &#8211; about the telco service ,. can someone please tell me HOW this piece of data &#8221; Love iphone&#8221; + &#8220;dislike AT&amp;T&#8221; can be INTEGRATED with the transactional data, that resides in the CRM databases?</p>
<p>I am lost and here is why:</p>
<p>[a] the internal database has transactional data of the existing customers &#8211; say &#8211; purchase, warranty, contact and call log data .. BUT how do i know if the above views &#8211; expressed &#8211; { love iphone but hate AT&amp;T&#8221; are views expressed by an existing customer ? </p>
<p>[b] The chatter on the web is not a &#8216;transaction&#8217; in the proverbial sense. A transaction from an ERP stand point starts with Identification and the  a records, backed by a reason. IF reason is purchase its in the sales data, if reason is warranty &#8211; its alos in sales data and if reason is customer complaint &#8211; its in the customer sevrice data -&gt; BUT -&gt; its LINKED to a customer profile &#8211; using relational database tables..</p>
<p>the fundamental precept of a relational database is : [a] entity &#8211; this means defining the customer and [b] relationship -&gt; this means &#8211; capturing and associating the transactions made for or on behalf of the customer &#8211; in the database tables &#8211; and then only it is displayed in the presentation layer &#8211; the UI layer.</p>
<p> well, on the web &#8211; the customer is :</p>
<p>[a] anonymous </p>
<p>[b] unidentifiable </p>
<p>[c] difficult to track and associate </p>
<p>so, we hit a practical problem -&gt; HOW to associate an &#8216;unstructured VIEW expressed by a customer on say twitter or facebook fan page or in a blog&#8221; &#8211; with a customer in any database that exists !</p>
<p>Think of it &#8211; its not easy if not impossible..</p>
<p>regards<br />
olga lednichenko</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Last 10 delicious.com links</title>
		<link>http://creativestride.com/blog/2010/06/01/contesting-the-death-of-tradition-crm-social-crm-is-a-process-and-not-a-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Last 10 delicious.com links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativestride.com/blog/?p=109#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] Contesting the Death of Traditional CRM: Social CRM is a Process and not a Technology &#8211; worth a read [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Contesting the Death of Traditional CRM: Social CRM is a Process and not a Technology &#8211; worth a read [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

